IRS Commissioner to Answer to Ways & Means on IRS Backdating Forms

House committee leaders questioned the IRS over a Tax Court case where IRS counsel was sanctioned for backdating penalty documents in a conservation easement case, raising oversight and accountability concerns.

 

By Christi Mondrik, J.D., CPA-Austin 

 

The House Ways and Means Committee Chair Jason Smith, and Oversight Subcommittee Chair David Schweikert issued a letter to IRS Commissioner Daniel Werfel on Feb. 27, 2024, questioning the IRS’ response to the U.S. Tax Court’s decision in LakePoint Land II LLC v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2023-111, (Aug. 29, 2023). In its decision, the tax court sanctioned IRS counsel for failing to alert the court it had backdated penalty approval documents asserting penalties – a penalty lead sheet – against a partnership in a conservation easement. The court found it had relied upon a false declaration and a backdated document when it discovered different versions of a lead sheet, one of which was signed in February 2017 but backdated to July 2016. The court found the actions of the revenue agent and respondent’s counsel “to be in bad faith and to have multiplied the proceedings in this case unreasonably and vexatiously.” The court imposed sanctions against the IRS but declined to award costs and fees to the petitioner.  

 


Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.
  • NIL Income for Student-Athletes: Tax Implications and Emerging Pitfalls for Practitioners
    The expansion of NIL opportunities has created complex tax issues for student-athletes, whose income is generally treated as self-employment business income. Common pitfalls include unreported non-cash compensation, multi-state tax exposure, weak recordkeeping and limited financial literacy, all of which heighten audit risk. As IRS scrutiny increases and new reporting rules emerge, CPAs must understand these challenges to effectively advise this growing group of taxpayers.
  • Data Processing Services – SaaS and Software Licenses
    Cloud-based SaaS is treated as a taxable data processing service in Texas, with 80% of the sales price subject to sales tax, compared with 100% taxation for traditional software licenses. Taxpayers using SaaS in multiple states can further reduce Texas tax by allocating the software’s usage between Texas and non‑Texas locations. This often results in significant savings and may allow refunds for past overpayments.

Support the Next Generation

Donate to TXCPA scholarships and help aspiring accountants achieve their goals.