OPR Says to De-CAFinate Your Old Client Authorizations

The IRS reminds tax practitioners to routinely withdraw outdated client authorizations from the Central Authorization File (CAF) to protect taxpayer data. Use a marked “WITHDRAW” Form 2848 or request a CAF77 report to manage and remove old records.

The IRS Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) recently reminded Circular 230 practitioners to maintain an up-to-date list of your valid authorizations in the IRS’ Central Authorization File (CAF) Unit and routinely withdraw any client authorizations no longer needed.  

Why withdraw old authorizations? Several provisions of Circular 230 implicate a practitioner’s obligation to client authorizations and a responsibility to safeguard taxpayer data. If an authorization is listed as active in the CAF, the possibility exists that a cybercriminal could misuse it to gain access to valuable taxpayer information. You can prevent that unnecessary connection and risk. 

There is no fixed form for withdrawing a CAF, but it must be done in writing and include all relative data. OPR says the easiest way is to write “WITHDRAW” across the top of the first page of a copy of the Form 2848, Power of Attorney and Declaration of Representation, with the current signature and date (see instructions). 

 

You can also request a CAF77 report for a printout or electronic copy of current authorizations. See Freedom of Information Act's sample CAF client listing request letter. Edit and return your list per the instructions. 

 

If you link your CAF numbers to your Tax Pro Account, you can manage all active authorizations in a more efficient and secure manner.  

 


Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.
  • NIL Income for Student-Athletes: Tax Implications and Emerging Pitfalls for Practitioners
    The expansion of NIL opportunities has created complex tax issues for student-athletes, whose income is generally treated as self-employment business income. Common pitfalls include unreported non-cash compensation, multi-state tax exposure, weak recordkeeping and limited financial literacy, all of which heighten audit risk. As IRS scrutiny increases and new reporting rules emerge, CPAs must understand these challenges to effectively advise this growing group of taxpayers.
  • Data Processing Services – SaaS and Software Licenses
    Cloud-based SaaS is treated as a taxable data processing service in Texas, with 80% of the sales price subject to sales tax, compared with 100% taxation for traditional software licenses. Taxpayers using SaaS in multiple states can further reduce Texas tax by allocating the software’s usage between Texas and non‑Texas locations. This often results in significant savings and may allow refunds for past overpayments.

Get Involved

Share your expertise and shape the future of the profession—volunteer with TXCPA and make a meaningful impact in your community.