IRS Removal of Automatic Accounting Methods Sure to Disappoint

Published: Jun 19, 2024

The IRS is increasing transfer pricing enforcement, sending letters to 180 U.S. subsidiaries of foreign companies with low margins or losses. Taxpayers should review documentation for cross-border transactions.

 

Michael Vinson, CPA – Houston 

 

The IRS' recent update in April to its automatic accounting method procedures (Rev. Proc. 2024-23) has significant implications for taxpayers.   

Now, there are two less methods that are on the automatic change list. This means that taxpayers must secure a formal letter (consent) from the IRS approving the change. The modification is likely to be met with dissatisfaction as automatic procedures—which do not require a user fee and have a more flexible filing timeline—are generally preferred by taxpayers. 

This revision impacts the application of Rev. Proc. 2015-13 by eliminating two frequent accounting method changes from the automatic list: (1) specific cost capitalization methods for inventory or self-constructed property, and (2) certain adjustments to the appropriate timing of revenue recognition. 

Taxpayers intending to implement either of these accounting method changes should reassess their implementation schedule. The Form 3115 for automatic accounting method changes can be filed any time before the tax return for the year of change is due. However, for non-automatic method changes, companies must file the Form 3115 by the last day of the desired tax year of change and pay a user fee. 

If a taxpayer submits a non-automatic Form 3115 requesting a change to an evidently permissible accounting method, the IRS is expected to consent, but this is not guaranteed. According to Rev. Proc. 2015-13, the IRS National Office can refuse a request to change a method if it deems that the requested method does not accurately represent the taxpayer's income or would not be conducive to efficient tax administration. 

Consequently, taxpayers should be aware of the changes and the implications that come from these items no longer being considered an automatic accounting method change. 

 

Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.
  • NIL Income for Student-Athletes: Tax Implications and Emerging Pitfalls for Practitioners
    The expansion of NIL opportunities has created complex tax issues for student-athletes, whose income is generally treated as self-employment business income. Common pitfalls include unreported non-cash compensation, multi-state tax exposure, weak recordkeeping and limited financial literacy, all of which heighten audit risk. As IRS scrutiny increases and new reporting rules emerge, CPAs must understand these challenges to effectively advise this growing group of taxpayers.
  • Data Processing Services – SaaS and Software Licenses
    Cloud-based SaaS is treated as a taxable data processing service in Texas, with 80% of the sales price subject to sales tax, compared with 100% taxation for traditional software licenses. Taxpayers using SaaS in multiple states can further reduce Texas tax by allocating the software’s usage between Texas and non‑Texas locations. This often results in significant savings and may allow refunds for past overpayments.
More News

Support the Next Generation

Donate to TXCPA scholarships and help aspiring accountants achieve their goals.

Scholarships