ERC Delays and Expiring Deadlines: The Case of Filing Protective Claims Now

Deferred gains from Qualified Opportunity Zone investments must be reported by Dec. 31, 2026. Learn what early planning steps and tax strategies CPAs should discuss with clients now.

 

By Leo Unzeitig, JD, CPA-San Antonio 

Chamberlain Hrdlicka 

 

Ah, the Employee Retention Credit (ERC) – that noble, if slightly bloated, stimulus lifeboat tossed to businesses during the pandemic. Like many government lifeboats, it came with its own set of barnacles: forms, deadlines, conflicting guidance, fraud and endless opportunities to unknowingly mess up.   

The most common issue puzzling practitioners is when (and even whether) taxpayers must amend an income tax return to reverse a wage expense that was reported on an ERC claim. This existential dilemma—let’s call it “To Amend or Not to Amend: A Taxing Tragedy in Two Acts”—is a drama for another time. 

For purposes of this discussion, let’s assume your client did amend their 2021 income tax return, dutifully subtracting out the wage expense at issue.   

Be on notice, your client may be running up against a looming statute of limitations issue.   

That’s because there is a good chance one or more of the taxpayer’s 2021 ERC claims is still pending. Indeed, the National Taxpayer Advocate recently noted that more than one million ERC claims are lingering somewhere in the agency.   

And herein lies the rub:  While the ERC claim may float in this bureaucratic purgatory indefinitely—suspended, untouched and, frankly, unloved—the same is not true of your client’s income tax return. The statute of limitations for amending or otherwise adjusting the income tax return in question will, in most cases, expire three years from the date the return was filed or two years from the date the tax was paid—whichever comes later. For the typical 2021 filer, this means the clock is running out right now, this year.   

This is where the whipsaw effect rears its paradoxical head: By the time the IRS gets around to officially denying your client’s ERC claim, the taxpayer may find themselves barred from re-claiming the wage expense deduction they originally backed out, leaving them stranded in a liminal space where both the deduction and the credit are permanently out of reach. 

But don’t fret. There is a solution: file a protective claim for refund. This little piece of bureaucratic armor lets taxpayers say, “Hey, IRS, this is dragging on, but I see what you’re doing and I’m not falling for it.” A protective claim can freeze the statute of limitations and preserves the taxpayer’s right to go back and fix their income tax return once the IRS finally gets around to resolving their ERC claim. 

It’s not glamorous; it won’t make you the hero of a Netflix miniseries, but it might just save your client some money. And in the world of tax law, saving money is second only to a refund.  

 


Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.
  • NIL Income for Student-Athletes: Tax Implications and Emerging Pitfalls for Practitioners
    The expansion of NIL opportunities has created complex tax issues for student-athletes, whose income is generally treated as self-employment business income. Common pitfalls include unreported non-cash compensation, multi-state tax exposure, weak recordkeeping and limited financial literacy, all of which heighten audit risk. As IRS scrutiny increases and new reporting rules emerge, CPAs must understand these challenges to effectively advise this growing group of taxpayers.
  • Data Processing Services – SaaS and Software Licenses
    Cloud-based SaaS is treated as a taxable data processing service in Texas, with 80% of the sales price subject to sales tax, compared with 100% taxation for traditional software licenses. Taxpayers using SaaS in multiple states can further reduce Texas tax by allocating the software’s usage between Texas and non‑Texas locations. This often results in significant savings and may allow refunds for past overpayments.

Support the Next Generation

Donate to TXCPA scholarships and help aspiring accountants achieve their goals.