USPS Making Changes to Postmark Date System

Published: Dec 5, 2025

USPS is changing its postmark rules effective 12/24/25. Machine postmarks may reflect processing date, not drop-off date, which could affect timely tax filings. To protect filing dates, request a manual postmark or use Certified or Registered Mail.

The U.S. Postal Service (USPS) is changing its postmark date system, effective 12/24/25. This new rule, published in the 11/24/25 Federal Register, clarifies that a machine-applied postmark indicates the date of the "first automated processing operation" at a processing facility, which may be later than the date the mail was dropped off. This could be problematic for tax filings, because if received after the due date, the document won't be considered timely filed or the payment timely made unless the postmark bears a date on or before the due date (IRC Sec. 7502). According to the rule, a sender who relies on this timely mailing rule should request a manual postmark by presenting their envelope at a USPS retail counter. The postage validation imprint applied to the envelope when a customer pays for postage will also show the correct USPS acceptance date. Senders may also use Registered or Certified Mail to obtain a receipt as evidence of the mailing date. FR Doc. 2025-20740.

Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.
  • NIL Income for Student-Athletes: Tax Implications and Emerging Pitfalls for Practitioners
    The expansion of NIL opportunities has created complex tax issues for student-athletes, whose income is generally treated as self-employment business income. Common pitfalls include unreported non-cash compensation, multi-state tax exposure, weak recordkeeping and limited financial literacy, all of which heighten audit risk. As IRS scrutiny increases and new reporting rules emerge, CPAs must understand these challenges to effectively advise this growing group of taxpayers.
  • Data Processing Services – SaaS and Software Licenses
    Cloud-based SaaS is treated as a taxable data processing service in Texas, with 80% of the sales price subject to sales tax, compared with 100% taxation for traditional software licenses. Taxpayers using SaaS in multiple states can further reduce Texas tax by allocating the software’s usage between Texas and non‑Texas locations. This often results in significant savings and may allow refunds for past overpayments.
More News

Support the Next Generation

Donate to TXCPA scholarships and help aspiring accountants achieve their goals.

Scholarships