California Penalty Abatement – There May be Hope Yet

California’s Franchise Tax Board offers several options for penalty relief that can help taxpayers avoid unnecessary costs. This article highlights practical abatement options that can help CPAs reduce or eliminate penalties for California residents and nonresidents.

By Torakichi Jesús Oba Pérez, EA, CPA, CalCPAs

According to etiquette experts, young children should not (yet) curse like their parents. This new era of work from home has made it that my poor child’s ears are inundated with inappropriate shouts of frustration as I review client files while realizing that I have, yet again, come up short in some California compliance matter. As I salve my ego by telling myself that its called a ‘practice’ for a reason, I think to myself that if a licensed California tax resident CPA misses a few of the state’s Franchise Tax Board (FTB) filing requirements, my brethren in Texas dealing with Californians (former or current) might want to have a few additional tools in their toolbox in the hopes they are able to save themselves some uncomfortable conversations about the root cause of their children’s precocious vocabulary.

California FTB Form 2918 – One-Time Penalty Abatement, Individual

In order to qualify for one-time penalty abatement, all of the following criteria must be met:

  1. Penalty requested for abatement is for a taxable year beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2022.
  2. Have not been approved for One-Time Penalty abatement previously.
  3. Have filed all your required income tax returns.
  4. Have paid in full or is currently on an approved installment agreement to pay all other taxes, penalties, fees, and interest due other than the timeliness penalty.

This has been used to great success when a taxpayer, California resident or non-resident, who otherwise would have filed a timely income tax return, missed a filing deadline for whatever reason and was assessed a late filing penalty. There is no reasonable cause required, but I would suggest being judicious as to what year to apply it to if a taxpayer has multiple years they are suddenly catching up on, as it is a one-time abatement.

The statue of limitations to claim a refund is the later of:

  1. Four years after the original tax return due date
  2. Four years after the due date of a timely filed tax return
  3. One year from the date of the overpayment

California FTB Form 2917 – Reasonable Cause, Individual and Fiduciary Claim for Refund

California FTB Form 2924 – Reasonable Cause, Business Entity Claim for Refund

Now we are in the territory of reasonable cause, which the FTB defines as a failure that occurred despite the exercise of ordinary business care and prudence, not due to willful neglect. Reasonable cause is evaluated case by case based on all the facts and documentation provided with FTB 2917 (individuals and fiduciaries) or 2924 (business entities).

Anecdotally, I understand that serious illness, incapacitation or death of the taxpayer or key person responsible for filing/paying of taxes, in addition to natural disasters or other catastrophic events, tend to make the reasonable cause arguments most likely to be accepted.

Additionally, the California Franchise Tax Board does not conform to federal relief from penalties based upon good filing history, but they may abate a penalty if you can provide IRS documentation that clearly states that the IRS abated a similar penalty for “reasonable cause.”

These would cover the most typically used penalty abatement requests, but perhaps your clients have the right fact patterns to look into the following:

  1. California FTB 3701 – Request for Abatement of Interest
  2. California FTB 3705 – Request for Taxpayer Advocate Equity Relief
  3. California FTB 4107 – Mandatory e-Pay Election to Discontinue or Waiver Request

FTB 4107 specifically states that if you have an e-pay penalty (individuals or businesses), then you would request an abatement of this e-pay penalty by filing of FTB 2917 if applicable to an individual.

 



Topics:

You May be Interested in

  • The IRS May Owe Your Clients Money from the COVID Period
    Recent court decisions have opened a largely overlooked opportunity for significant tax refunds based on mandatory disaster relief under IRC Section 7508A during the federally declared COVID-19 disaster period. As a result, interest and penalties assessed during this period may be invalid and refundable, and some taxpayers who received refunds may also be entitled to unpaid overpayment interest. While uncertainty remains and the IRS may resist such claims, timely protective refund filings are critical to preserve clients rights as the statute of limitations continues to run.
  • TXCPA Advocates for Accounting’s Recognition in Definition of Professional Degrees for Student Loan Eligibility
    TXCPA submitted a formal comment to the U.S. Department of Education urging recognition of accounting as a professional degree program to protect graduate-level federal loan access and strengthen the future CPA pipeline.
  • The Verdict is In. The Texas Franchise Tax is GILTI, Raising New Questions and Potential Issues
    Beginning with the 2026 report year, the Texas Comptroller will align the franchise tax with the current Internal Revenue Code, likely requiring GILTI to be included in total revenue. This change raises sourcing, statutory and potential constitutional questions for businesses with foreign operations, creating new uncertainty and possible tax impacts.

Support the Next Generation

Donate to TXCPA scholarships and help aspiring accountants achieve their goals.