November 10, 2023

Special-Purpose Acquisition Companies Growing More Popular But Present Unique Accounting Issues

The use of special-purpose acquisition companies (SPACs), also known as blank check companies, has increased exponentially over the past few years. They allow investors to take companies public without the costs and delays associated with traditional IPOs. A SPAC is created to pool investor funds to accomplish a merger or acquisition within a specified period of time. At creation, the acquisition target is generally not known to the investors. Since 2020, more than half of U.S. IPOs have utilized the SPAC structure.

Before we discuss the typical SPAC structure, let’s examine the advantages it offers over the traditional IPO. The SPAC is registered with the SEC and is a publicly traded company. As such, the public can buy its shares; hence the nickname “poor man’s private equity fund.” The SPAC can typically go public in just a few months, shortening the time typically required for a conventional IPO of six months to more than a year. However, it lacks an active business since the acquisition of a target has not been completed.

Given the simplicity of the SPAC balance sheet, preparation for going public is both quicker and less expensive. This is not to say that the costs associated with taking the target company public are avoided fully. Financial information of the target is generally required to be presented to the SPAC investors to receive final approval of the transaction and the target must be “public ready” upon completion of the merger.

A SPAC transaction generally follows a well-established path:

  • Units comprised of Class A shares and some fraction of a warrant are sold to investors for $10 upon the SPAC going public. This will generally compose about 80% of the share capital.
  • The sponsors are awarded founder shares and warrants for a nominal investment to make up the remaining 20% of the share capital.
  • The proceeds are held in trust to be used for the acquisition of a target within a limited time frame; usually less than 24 months.

If the acquisition is not completed within the window, the investors’ shares are redeemed (plus interest) from the funds in trust. However, the sponsors can generally induce the investors to extend the acquisition deadline by making a contribution to the trust fund.

Investors can sell their shares and/or warrants on the secondary market at any time. Sponsors are generally required to retain their shares and warrants.

Once a target is identified and the merger is pending, investors can opt out by demanding redemption of their shares. They can retain the warrants even if the shares are redeemed. For those who participate on the initial offering of the SPAC shares, they are therefore guaranteed the return of their initial investment. Investors buying the shares on the secondary market receive no warrants and pay market price.

The warrants (typically with a strike price of $11.50) generally have a term of five years from the date of the acquisition. The SPAC may call the warrants if their trading price for a period of days (usually 20 -30) exceeds a stated price, which is generally $18. This call feature basically forces holders to exercise the warrants. Sponsor warrants do not include the call feature. The public warrants can only be exercised for cash while the sponsor warrants may be for cash or shares.

Investors should be aware that their shares will typically be diluted. The sponsor shares are awarded without cash investment, which results in dilution of the investor shares of up to 20%. Redemption of Class A shares from investors who opt out prior to the merger can typically run as high as 40 – 50%. Therefore, at merger, only 40% of the share capital may actually be fully cash funded. If the price of the shares rises, the warrants are then likely to be exercised at the $11.50 strike price, further diluting the return of the initial investors.

Recent SEC scrutiny of the warrant accounting has resulted in restatements by several SPACs. Many SPACs had concluded that the warrants should be classified as equity. However, to be classified as equity, the company must evaluate the instrument under a two-step process: (1) the contingent exercise provisions and (2) the settlement options. And it is the latter that has prompted the SEC to disagree with the conclusions of the reporting entities.

To qualify as equity, the settlement must be a “fixed-for-fixed” calculation with the exception that any adjustments are based on standard inputs used to determine the value of “fixed-for-fixed” equity forwards or options. The sponsor options are not redeemable and therefore fail the exception since “type of holder” is not a standard input.

The public warrants often fail the exceptions since the SPAC fails to control the ability to settle with shares. This failure is based on the provision in most SPAC warrant agreements that allows the holders to elect to receive cash in the event of a tender or exchange of the underlaying shares in the context of a change of control.

SPACs failing the exceptions have been required to restate their financials classifying the warrants as derivatives in the liability section of the balance sheet, which requires revaluation at every report date. By the time a restatement is identified, the acquisition of the target has likely been completed, making the restatement an event of note to the investors.

Recently, there has been an increase in the number of SPACs opting to liquidate rather than close acquisitions. Given the complexities of the unique structures of SPACs and the SEC’s accounting treatment evaluation, only time will tell if they remain popular acquisition vehicles.

Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

About the Author: Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA, is clinical professor of accounting at Baylor University. Contact him at Don_Carpenter@baylor.edu.

 

 

 

 

  • TXCPA’s 2024-2025 Year in Review

    TXCPA addressed key challenges in the accounting profession through strategic initiatives focused on the CPA talent shortage, advocating for licensure flexibility, expanding student outreach, and enhancing member services. Key achievements included support for legislation introducing additional CPA pathways, strong participation in advocacy efforts and impressive engagement in CPE programs.
    View Article
  • CPE: The Significance of Codes of Conduct in Professional Organizations - Standards for Ethical Practice

    This article examines the ethical codes of four major professional organizations - AICPA, ACFE, CFA Institute, and IIA - highlighting their shared values of integrity, objectivity, confidentiality, and competence. While all emphasize ethical behavior and professional standards, each code is tailored to the unique responsibilities of its field.
    View Article
  • 89th Legislative Session Review: New House Leader, Rule Changes and a Productive Session for TXCPA

    The 89th session of the Texas Legislature began on January 14, 2025. TXCPA has been hard at work advocating its legislative agenda and has had a very productive session. Texas is one of the state leaders in addressing CPA pipeline issues.
    View Article
  • Special Report: The Digital Transformation of Accounting

    Digital transformation is reshaping accounting, making technology adoption essential for firms to stay competitive. Automation streamlines reporting, while document management systems improve organization and compliance. Embracing innovation allows firms to boost efficiency, deliver deeper client value and lead in a rapidly evolving profession.
    View Article
  • Key Considerations for Financial Statement Auditors Before Leveraging Artificial Intelligence in Their Audits

    There is a growing role for generative AI tools to be used in financial statement audits. The tools offer numerous advantages, including enhanced data analysis, continuous learning, predictive insights, audit automation, and cost savings. However, challenges remain, such as data privacy risks, bias in training data and the inability to verify source data. Learn more in this article.
    View Article
  • How Accountants Can Embrace an Entrepreneurial Spirit

    The use of AI-driven technologies has resulted in numerous tools that threaten the existence of many professionals. Accountants are not immune to the threat since many of their tasks can be automated. To stay relevant, accountants can upskill or start their own business. Despite low risk tolerance, their financial expertise makes them strong entrepreneurial candidates.
    View Article
  • Maximizing Audits: Key Elements for Efficient and Successful Financial Assessments

    Audits provide stakeholders with reliable financial insights, but the process can be daunting for companies. To prepare effectively, businesses should focus on strong internal controls, accurate transaction records and clear, compliant financial statements. Internal controls help prevent fraud and ensure accurate reporting, while well-organized documentation streamlines auditor reviews.
    View Article
  • Spotlight on the Accounting Profession: Jessica Rodriguez Reyes

    Jessica Rodriguez Reyes, an outstanding undergraduate in the BS/MS accounting program at the University of North Texas, shares her journey as a first-generation college student. With internship experiences in small and large firms, Jessica emphasizes the value of hands-on learning and her dedication to mentoring other students is making a noticeable impact.
    View Article
  • A Year of Progress and Impact

    As the 2024–2025 membership year ends, we reflect on a year of progress driven by the dedication of leadership, volunteers and, most importantly, our members. Together, we advanced initiatives, strengthened our community and expanded our reach. Looking forward, even greater opportunities lie ahead to build on this success.
    View Article
  • What’s Happening Around Texas - May-June 2025

    Members in Austin, Dallas and San Antonio participated in community service activities and professional networking events. Fort Worth hosted a successful masquerade ball to fund scholarships, while TXCPA South Plains introduced its new board. Southeast Texas engaged students at a career expo, Victoria hosted a student-CPA coffee meet-up, and Wichita Falls organized an educational event at Midwestern State University.
    View Article
  • Accounting Firms Continue to Innovate in Response to Rapidly Changing Market Conditions

    There is a growing trend of private equity investments in CPA firms amid declining CPA Exam participation, talent shortages and rising reliance on AI. While offering growth opportunities, the deals raise concerns about maintaining professional independence in a profit-driven model.
    View Article
  • Take Note

    In this edition of Take Note: Renew Your TXCPA Membership Today; TXCPA Passport is On-Demand CPE at Your Fingertips; Tips to Reduce Digital Overload; Get Published in Today’s CPA Magazine
    View Article
  • Classifieds

    The classified ad section features listings for practice owners looking to sell, professionals seeking firms to purchase and a variety of specialized services. Whether you're looking to expand, sell or explore niche opportunities, these classified ads can connect you to valuable business prospects and resources.
    View Article

CHAIR
Mohan Kuruvilla, Ph.D., CPA

PRESIDENT/CEO
Jodi Ann Ray, CAE, CCE, IOM

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Melinda Bentley, CAE

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR
Jennifer Johnson, CPA

MANAGER, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
Peggy Foley
pfoley@tx.cpa

MANAGING EDITOR
DeLynn Deakins
ddeakins@tx.cpa

COLUMN EDITOR
Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

DIGITAL MARKETING SPECIALIST
Wayne Hardin, CDMP, PCM®

CLASSIFIEDS
DeLynn Deakins

Texas Society of CPAs
14131 Midway Rd., Suite 850
Addison, TX 75001
972-687-8550
ddeakins@tx.cpa

 

Editorial Board
Derrick Bonyuet-Lee, CPA-Austin;
Aaron Borden, CPA-Dallas;
Don Carpenter, CPA-Central Texas;
Rhonda Fronk, CPA-Houston;
Aaron Harris, CPA-Dallas;
Baria Jaroudi, CPA-Houston;
Elle Kathryn Johnson, CPA-Houston;
Jennifer Johnson, CPA-Dallas;
Lucas LaChance, CPA-Dallas, CIA;
Nicholas Larson, CPA-Fort Worth;
Anne-Marie Lelkes, CPA-Corpus Christi;
Bryan Morgan, Jr, CPA-Austin;
Stephanie Morgan, CPA-East Texas;
Kamala Raghavan, CPA-Houston;
Amber Louise Rourke, CPA-Brazos Valley;
Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA
Nikki Lee Shoemaker, CPA-East Texas, CGMA;
Natasha Winn, CPA-Houston.

CONTRIBUTORS
Melinda Bentley; Kenneth Besserman; Barry Kaplan; Holly McCauley; Shicoyia Morgan; Craig Nauta; Kari Owen; Dipesh Patel, CPA, CGMA; John Ross; Lani Shepherd; Patty Wyatt

 

Your TXCPA membership has not been renewed for 2025 -2026. Renew now.