Assessing AI From a Tax Perspective, Part 2

By William M. VanDenburgh, Ph.D.; Kimberly J. Tribou, Ph.D., CPA; and James M. Braswell, Ph.D.

While artificial intelligence (AI) can support the filing of tax returns, its uncontrolled use in an accounting practice poses significant risks. The wording of the AI prompt can greatly impact the quality of its response. AI’s accuracy is improved with prompt specificity, but divulging a client’s privileged tax information in a prompt could be a violation of AICPA’s Statement on Standards for Tax Services (SSTS) and the IRS’s Circular 230: Regulations Governing Practice before the Internal Revenue Service.

Consistent with these standards, accounting professionals need to verify the output of these tools in the same way they would verify someone else’s work. Our prior companion piece, “Assessing AI From a Tax Perspective, Part 1,” strongly indicates that current AI tools are error-prone and provide limited value to preparers. In this article, we discuss the development and utilization of AI, as well as ethical/practice considerations for tax preparers.

AI History and Explosion

Chatbots, which utilize natural language processing and interact with users through prompt-based commands, have been used in computer applications since the mid-1960s. Companies began experimenting with machine learning and generative AI, the data-intensive technologies powering chatbots like ChatGPT and Microsoft Copilot, in the early 2000s.

Machine learning identifies patterns within its training data and uses these patterns to automate tasks and formulate predictions. Generative AI creates new content – such as computer coding, images or written works – in response to specific user prompts.

OpenAI, the company that developed and released ChatGPT, was founded in 2015 as a not-for-profit research company committed to the ethical development of artificial intelligence. From its inception, OpenAI initially pledged to make its AI technology freely available. Keeping this pledge, OpenAI released ChatGPT 3.0 to the public in November 2022.1

Other tech firms released competing chat-based AI tools in the months following ChatGPT’s release. Both Microsoft and Google subsequently launched sophisticated AI tools (Copilot and Gemini, respectively) in late 2023.2 Companies have also adopted generative AI technology specific to their organizations or adapted existing AI tools for limited purposes. For example, KPMG partnered with Microsoft to incorporate OpenAI technology atop its proprietary systems.3

Please see Exhibit 1 at the end of this article for a summary of the evolution of chat-based technology as a means of accessing artificial intelligence.

Comparing Tools

Currently, four major AI tools are publicly available: Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini, Perplexity, and ChatGPT, with other specialized tools like TaxGPT available on a fee-basis.4 Table 1 compares the costs of three tools that may support tax research and preparation.

Table 1. Comparison of Costs of Chatbot AI Tools

   

Microsoft Copilot

Perplexity.ai

TaxGPT

Underlying Technology

GPT 4o (OpenAI)

GPT-4 Omni and Claude 3

GPT-4o (OpenAI) and Claude 3.5

Per User Cost*

Copilot Pro for Individuals: $20/month; Copilot for Microsoft 365: $30/month

Free users can conduct 5 free daily searches; subscribers (/month) can conduct 600 daily searches

$1,000 per seat

* As of the writing of this article




Microsoft’s Copilot, which uses OpenAI’s GPT-4 technology, was included in Windows 11 updates beginning in November 2023. Initially tested in companies with 300 or more employees, the tool became widely available in early 2024. Microsoft currently charges corporate subscribers a fee of $30 per user per month for its Microsoft Copilot 365 tool.

The Perplexity.ai tool, launched in September 2023, utilizes artificial intelligence to provide direct and factual answers to internet search questions.5 While ChatGPT and Copilot rely on their large language model (LLM) training to generate responses, Perplexity uses AI (GPT-4 Omni and Claude 3) to tailor real-time search prompts, summarize results and possibly return more accurate results.

TaxGPT utilizes both OpenAI GPT.4o and Claude 3.5 generative AI technologies to support tax research, tax preparation and tax communication. TaxGPT claims that its single focus on tax issues and its ability to search tax law in real time significantly reduce the risk of AI-hallucinations, which occur when the system interprets the prompt incorrectly and provides logical but incorrect responses.6

Initial results were mixed as to whether the workplace enhancements created by AI tools are worth the investment. For example, Copilot is known to make mistakes when asked to “crunch numbers” in Excel, the fundamental financial spreadsheet. Juniper Networks’ CIO Sharon Mandell said, “I wouldn’t say we’re ready to spend $30 per user for every user in the company.”7

However, chemical company Chemours provided Copilot access and AI training to over 1,000 professionals, finding it reduced the time required to compile and analyze financial data. For tax professionals, the monthly or annual per user costs could add up, but the investment could be worth it if it expedites addressing inevitable tax questions that occur during the tax preparation process.

Asking the Chatbots

How AI is utilized and the way the questions are asked impacts the results. Since each of these tools differ slightly in the underlying AI technology and the LLMs used to train the tools, we used Copilot, Perplexity and TaxGPT to answer tax preparation questions. The results of these queries are presented in Exhibit 2 at the end of this article.

While chat-based AI tools can automate routine tasks and support tax decision-making, using these tools without training and professional judgment can result in error-prone tax returns and could leave tax professionals susceptible to penalties. As seen in our queries, answers were often misleading or wrong.

At times, all three tools appeared to answer prompts with hedged or statistically likely responses, rather than technically or factually accurate responses. Copilot could provide disparate answers to the same tax questions depending on whether the (1) More Creative, (2) More Balanced, or (3) More Precise mode was selected. Additionally, Copilot did not provide consistent answers if the question was asked multiple times.

The AI tools used in our comparison have time limitations. Copilot crafted most of its responses from its training database, which was current through 2021. As federal, state and local laws are constantly changing, this limitation could significantly impact tax preparation.

The GPT-4 technology embedded in each tool can execute real-time internet searches; in our tests, the search tool did so with limited success. Only Perplexity could correctly determine the percentage of government securities within Fidelity’s Government Money Market Fund (SPAXX); this may have occurred as we asked at a later date. Further, TaxGPT’s internet search ability appears to be limited to tax preparation, not the valuations that support it.

AI’s current limitations can result in responses that are vague, hedged or patently incorrect. Our findings are consistent with other tax-based experiments using ChatGPT.8 Without a proper understanding of the underlying tax rules, a tax professional who follows the advice of chatbots risks providing incorrect information to their clients or the IRS.

Tax Data Confidentiality Risks

To avoid violating AICPA and IRS standards of professional conduct, tax professionals must apply caution when using AI to support their work. Both AICPA and IRS standards require tax professionals to protect privileged tax information. Per OpenAI’s privacy policy, the application collects user-provided information to support its research, train the bot and improve the quality of future responses.9

Prompting the bot with privileged client information may inadvertently result in divulging this information in future prompts; however, TaxGPT’s privacy settings reportedly mitigate this risk. Unauthorized disclosures of privileged tax return information could be subject to strict and severe IRS penalties.

Additionally, Circular 230 requires due diligence from the tax professional and this due diligence extends to reliance on others. Using a chat-based AI tool to support tax preparation thus requires “engaging, supervising, training, and evaluating” the processes and the output provided by the bot.

Circular 230 imposes an even higher standard for written tax advice, forbidding tax professionals from relying on the advice of others if “the practitioner knows or reasonably should know that the opinion of the other person should not be relied on.”10 AI’s time limitations and admonition to “always consult with a tax professional or the IRS for the most accurate and up-to-date information” cast significant doubt on the reliability of the tool for many tax questions.

Implications of Errors on Returns

Our study illustrates how utilizing AI in tax preparation can yield incorrect answers to complex tax questions. It is possible that AI can be used to support the preparation of “simple” 1040 returns, freeing preparers to focus on complex tax matters that require significant judgment and reducing preparation errors that may occur near the filing deadline.

Our companion article ("Assessing AI From a Tax Perspective, Part 1") observed widely variable estimations of the tax basis used to calculate taxable income from investments. Reliance on AI’s bogus estimations could widen this tax gap.

Tax Note: The IRS is utilizing AI to combat the estimated $700 billion annual tax gap. In October 2024, Martin Fiore, deputy vice chair of tax at EY America, stated, “With AI, millions of lines of information can be looked at in minutes or hours instead of weeks or months.”11 As early as 2020, the IRS, states and foreign governments were utilizing AI to improve tax audits.12

Conclusion: Utilize AI Platforms With Extreme Care

Based on our tax scenario questions arising from the 2023 tax filing season, chat-based AI tools cannot fully synthesize constantly evolving federal and state laws, regulations and court opinions that drive tax judgments. While it will be interesting to see if AI tools’ tax answers improve in the coming years, tax law could be difficult or impossible for AI to truly master, as tax law is often full of gray areas, legal interpretations and changing rules.

AI answers are based largely on available reams of historical data that take time to incorporate into an AI platform. For certain tax prompts, Copilot’s database only included updates through December 2021.

Tax professionals should utilize AI platforms with extreme care, as answers are often outdated, wrong, misleading, and/or incomplete (so-called AI hallucinations). Further, tax queries become incorporated in future updates to AI platforms and this can cause material data confidentiality concerns (i.e., AICPA Statement on SSTS and IRS Circular 230).

As Beverly Goodman, a tax manager quoted in the Washington Post, said, “I feel that my job as a tax professional is very secure.” The results of our study strongly support this statement.

Exhibit 1. Evolution of Chat-Based AI
1966: First chatbot, ELIZA, is programmed to identify key terms in user prompt and respond with sympathetic rephrasing.
1980s: Chatbot programming incorporates statistical modeling to forecast the most likely conversational response. 
Early 2000s: E-Commerce gives rise to new chatbot-driven digital assistants, such as Alaska Airlines’ Jenn. 
2011: Apple phones begin featuring Siri, which uses a large language model to respond to user prompts and automate tasks.
2014: Amazon launches Alexa, its digital assistant powered by large language models.
2015: OpenAI founded as a not-for-profit organization devoted to making artificial intelligence technology widely and freely available.
2022: ChatGPT 3.0 released to the public.
2023: (March) ChatGPT 3.5 released to the public and ChatGPT 4.0 made available to paid subscribers. (September) Perplexity launches its AI-assisted search tool. (November) Microsoft begins incorporating Copilot, its GPT-4 powered AI tool, within Windows 11 updates. (December) Google launches its upgraded AI tool, Gemini.
2024: Microsoft advertises its Copilot tool during a Super Bowl advertisement.


Exhibit 2. Comparing GPT Tool Responses to Tax Prompts
In late April 2024, we asked AI platforms Perplexity and TaxGPT the questions below and compared these tools’ results we obtained earlier with Copilot’s during the 2024 tax season. We did not observe significant improvements in quality or accuracy using these tools.
Question: SPAXX % of US government securities held in 2023 (41.18 percent)
Copilot: Provided 2022 rates and recommended checking with Fidelity for updated information.
Perplexity: Correct.
TaxGPT: Could Not Determine.
Question: Closing value of Coca-Cola stock on October 5, 1995 (It was $17.66 per share, split-adjusted)
Copilot: The earliest recorded stock quote was $9.30 on December 29, 1995. Copilot recommended checking a “detailed historical stock price database.”
Perplexity: Could Not Determine. Like Copilot, the closest information available was the closing price for Coca-Cola (KO) on December 29, 1995, which was $12.92.
TaxGPT: Could Not Determine. It referred us to financial databases, stock market archives or historical stock price services.
Question: Per the IRC, does the cost of a computer qualify for education credits?
Copilot: Responded vaguely, that “…the cost of a computer may qualify for education credits under certain conditions.” None of Copilot’s three precision modes answered completely correctly. 
Perplexity: Incorrect. Perplexity’s search concluded that “the cost of a computer qualifies for education credits as long as it is used primarily by the beneficiary…”
TaxGPT: Incorrectly reported that a computer can be a qualifying expense (if required by the institution) under both AOTC and the LLC.

About the Authors: William M. VanDenburgh, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Accounting at the College of Charleston (vandenburghbm@cofc.edu). Kimberly Jane Tribou, Ph.D., CPA, is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at the College of Charleston (triboukj@cofc.edu). James M. Braswell, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Accounting at the College of Charleston (braswelljm@cofc.edu).

           

 

Footnotes

1. OpenAI blog, 12/11/2015: https://openai.com/blog/introducing-openai

2. Microsoft Copilot announcement: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/09/21/announcing-microsoft-copilot-your-everyday-ai-companion/; Google Gemini (Will Knight, Wired Magazine): https://www.wired.com/story/google-gemini-generative-ai-boom/

3. https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/kpmg-llp-and-microsoft-establish-industry-leading-initiative-to-scale-generative-ai-across-audit-tax-and-advisory-301822666.html, 5/11/23

4. https://copilot.microsoft.com/https://blog.google/technology/ai/google-gemini-ai/#sundar-note, https://www.perplexity.ai/ and https://chat.openai.com/auth/login

5. Forbes Magazine on Perplexity.ai: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joannechen/2023/09/06/how-perplexityai-is-pioneering-the-future-of-search/?sh=5dcde902ad91

6. https://www.cpajournal.com/2023/09/19/chatgpt-for-legal-and-tax-professionals/, September 2023; https://www.taxgpt.com/blog/taxgpt-vs-chatgpt

7. https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/early-adopters-of-microsofts-ai-bot-wonder-if-its-worth-the-money-2e74e3a2?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1, 2/13/24

8. For a sampling of these experiments, https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/news/2023/jun/can-chatgpt-answer-clients-questions.htmlhttps://www.taxnotes.com/tax-notes-talk/podcast/chatgpt-takes-tax/7g8z and https://wapo.st/43hBwaJ-

9. https://www.cpajournal.com/2023/09/19/chatgpt-for-legal-and-tax-professionals/, September 2023

10. IRS Circular 230, §10.22(a)(1), §10.22(b) and §10.37(b)(1) and https://www.cpajournal.com/2023/09/19/chatgpt-for-legal-and-tax-professionals/, September 2023

11. https://www.barrons.com/articles/the-irs-will-use-ai-to-do-more-tax-audits-its-not-all-bad-b3c03bf1?mod=Searchresults, 10/12/24

12. https://www.wsj.com/articles/ai-comes-to-the-tax-code-11582713000, 2/26/20

Exhibit 1 Links

Evolution of Chat-Based AI: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/20/tech/chatbot-ai-history/index.html

2011, Apple phones: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-siri-alexa-brief-history-conversational-ai-raghu/

2014, Amazon launches Alexa: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/from-siri-alexa-brief-history-conversational-ai-raghu/

2015, OpenAI founded: https://openai.com/blog/introducing-openai

2019, OpenAI enters into licensing agreement with Microsoft: https://openai.com/blog/microsoft-invests-in-and-partners-with-openai

2022, ChatGPT 3.0 released to the public: https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-new-chatgpt-what-you-get-with-gpt-4-vs-gpt-35

2023, ChatGPT 4.0 made available to paid subscribers: https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-new-chatgpt-what-you-get-with-gpt-4-vs-gpt-35

2023, Perplexity launches its AI-assisted search tool: https://www.forbes.com/sites/joannechen/2023/09/06/how-perplexityai-is-pioneering-the-future-of-search/?sh=5dcde902ad91

2023, Microsoft begins incorporating Copilot: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2023/09/21/announcing-microsoft-copilot-your-everyday-ai-companion/

2023, Google launches its upgraded AI tool, Gemini: https://www.wired.com/story/google-gemini-generative-ai-boom/

Thanks to the Sponsors of Today's CPA Magazine

This content was made possible by the sponsors of this issue of Today's CPA Magazine:

Accounting Biz Brokers

Accounting Practice Sales

Capstan

CPA Charge

Goodman Financial

Poe Group Advisors

 

 


  • TXCPA Strategic Plan

    Building What’s Next: TXCPA’s 2025-26 Year in Review

    TXCPA’s 2025–26 Year in Review highlights how the organization is responding to rapid change in the accounting profession through a clear strategic vision focused on people, innovation and advocacy. Key efforts include new programs, enhanced CPE and learning through AcctoFi, and technology and chapter integration initiatives. The year also marked major legislative wins, positioning Texas as a national leader.
    View Article
  • CPE: Option-Based Contracts and Foreign Currency Transactions

    This article covers option-based contracts in foreign currency transactions and their treatment as derivatives under ASC 815. It highlights how options differ from forwards and futures, outlines call and put options and their accounting implications, defines key derivative terminology, and illustrates how FX options can hedge one-sided currency risk while preserving upside potential.
    View Article
    Underlyings
  • volunteer leadership

    Celebrating Progress. Shaping What’s Next.

    This issue of Today’s CPA reflects on TXCPA’s achievements during the 2025–2026 membership year while looking ahead to the future. It highlights advocacy successes, profession updates, expanded education offerings, technology investments, and strong member and volunteer engagement. As the year closes, members are encouraged to stay engaged and help shape what’s next.
    View Article
  • Investing in the Future Through the Silent Auction

    View Article
    TXCPA Silent Auction
  • Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions

    CARB vs. No-CARB – The California Climate Accountability Package

    California’s Climate Accountability Package significantly expands corporate climate disclosure requirements, mandating detailed greenhouse gas emissions reporting and climate‑risk analysis for companies doing business in the state. Ongoing legal challenges remain, but enforcement timelines are intact, placing growing responsibility on companies and CPAs to manage data quality, Scope 3 estimates and audit‑ready disclosures.
    View Article
  • Justice for Fraud Victims Project: Bridging the Justice Gap in Financial Fraud

    The Justice for Fraud Victims Project (JFVP) is a national program that delivers free forensic accounting and fraud investigation services to vulnerable individuals, small businesses and nonprofits. With partnerships among universities, anti-fraud professionals and law enforcement, they help uncover financial crimes and educate future forensic accountants. The model is expanding, including a new program at Lubbock Christian University.
    View Article
    Pro Bono Services
  • Quality Control Systems

    A Refresher on Auditor Independence: Best Practices Every CPA Should Know

    Auditor independence is essential to maintaining trust in the accounting profession, requiring both objectivity and the appearance of impartiality. Common threats - such as self-interest, self-review and familiarity - continue to lead to violations. Strong firm policies, ongoing training and effective use of technology are key to preventing these issues.
    View Article
  • After QuickBooks Desktop: What CPAs Need to Know Now

    This article outlines the key implications of QuickBooks Desktop's phased discontinuation, including service discontinuation risks, operational failures, backup and archival strategies, migration challenges, and alternative accounting platforms. It also provides guidance for CPAs to take a proactive approach to managing and executing client migrations.
    View Article
    Xero
  • Tax‑Exempt Securities

    Are Municipal Bond Investors Sitting on a Ticking Tax Bomb?

    Tax‑exempt municipal bonds purchased at deep discounts can quietly trigger ordinary income taxation under the IRS de minimis rule, eroding after‑tax returns and creating surprise tax bills at maturity. By comparing after‑tax “true yield” and proactively swapping discounted bonds for higher‑coupon alternatives, CPAs and financial advisors can help clients defuse a hidden tax bomb and improve portfolio outcomes.
    View Article
  • Risks, Realities and the Evolving Role of CPAs Auditing Emerging Technologies

    Emerging technologies are reshaping auditing by embedding automation, advanced analytics and decentralized systems into core business processes. While these tools improve efficiency and insight, they introduce new risks that challenge traditional audit approaches. CPAs must adapt methods, rely more heavily on professional judgment, and uphold independence and integrity to sustain trust in financial reporting.
    View Article
    Quantum Computing
  • volunteer advocacy

    What’s Happening Around Texas - May-June 2026

    TXCPA chapters across Texas are making an impact through service, networking and professional development. Recent highlights include volunteer and scholarship efforts in Austin, community engagement and member meetups in Dallas, student outreach and advocacy in East Texas, and career-focused events in Houston that strengthen connections within the accounting community.
    View Article
  • Advocacy Update – Elections and the 2027 Legislative Session are Right Around the Corner

    TXCPA is preparing for the 2027 Texas legislative session as the 2026 elections shape the political and policy landscape. Key focuses include monitoring election outcomes, emerging legislative issues and national deregulation efforts that could impact CPA licensure and practice, while encouraging continued member engagement and advocacy.
    View Article
    volunteer leadership
  • Service differentiation

    Why Positioning Matters More Than Ever for CAS Firms

    Client advisory services deliver the most value when firms clearly define who they serve and which problems they solve. Clear positioning enables standardized workflows, repeatable service offerings and more predictable growth.
    View Article
  • Take Note

    In this edition of Take Note: Renew Your TXCPA Membership; Accountants Confidential Assistance Network (ACAN); 2026 CPE Programs; Word Game - Positioning That Powers Growth
    View Article
    Word Challenge
  • Classifieds

    The Classifieds section of Today's CPA provides a one-stop destination to find practices for sale, connect with buyers, and access services that support growth, transition and market expansion.
    View Article

CHAIR
Mohan Kuruvilla, Ph.D., CPA

PRESIDENT/CEO
Jodi Ann Ray, CAE, CCE, IOM

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Melinda Bentley, CAE

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR
Jennifer Johnson, CPA

MANAGER, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
Peggy Foley
pfoley@tx.cpa

MANAGING EDITOR
DeLynn Deakins
ddeakins@tx.cpa

COLUMN EDITOR
Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

DIGITAL MARKETING SPECIALIST
Wayne Hardin, CDMP, PCM®

CLASSIFIEDS
DeLynn Deakins

Texas Society of CPAs
14131 Midway Rd., Suite 850
Addison, TX 75001
972-687-8550
ddeakins@tx.cpa

 

Editorial Board
Derrick Bonyuet-Lee, CPA-Austin;
Aaron Borden, CPA-Dallas;
Don Carpenter, CPA-Central Texas;
Rhonda Fronk, CPA-Houston;
Aaron Harris, CPA-Dallas;
Baria Jaroudi, CPA-Houston;
Elle Kathryn Johnson, CPA-Houston;
Jennifer Johnson, CPA-Dallas;
Lucas LaChance, CPA-Dallas, CIA;
Nicholas Larson, CPA-Fort Worth;
Anne-Marie Lelkes, CPA-Corpus Christi;
Bryan Morgan, Jr, CPA-Austin;
Stephanie Morgan, CPA-East Texas;
Kamala Raghavan, CPA-Houston;
Amber Louise Rourke, CPA-Brazos Valley;
Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA
Nikki Lee Shoemaker, CPA-East Texas, CGMA;
Natasha Winn, CPA-Houston.

CONTRIBUTORS
Melinda Bentley; Kenneth Besserman; Kristie Estrada; Holly McCauley; Craig Nauta; Kari Owen; John Ross; Lani Shepherd; April Twaddle; Patty Wyatt