January 15, 2024

Handling an Estate with S Corporation Stock

By Jovana Popovich

No matter your level of experience in estate administration matters, it is prudent to revisit the Code and Regulations whenever working on an estate where the decedent owned S corporation stock at death so as not to inadvertently terminate the corporation’s S status.

This article aims to provide a high-level overview and reference tool covering the practical, procedural and timing matters applicable to estates and testamentary trusts that typically arise during an estate administration. This article is not intended to be a substitute for a thorough analysis of the pertinent Code and Regulations provisions, but rather a basic reference tool for practitioners to consult as a high-level guide.

Permissible Shareholders of 
S Corporation Stock 

Code Section 1361 provides the requirements that a corporation must meet to make an S corporation election. Among other restrictions, the corporation can have no more than 100 shareholders and only certain persons own stock in the corporation. These eligible shareholders include, but are not limited to, U.S. citizens and resident aliens, estates of individuals who were eligible S corporation shareholders at death, and certain trusts. (Code Sections 1361(b)(1) and 1361(c)(2)).

Importantly, a single ineligible shareholder can cause an existing S corporation to lose its S status and automatically convert to a C corporation. (Code Section 1362(d)(2)). As noted above, this article focuses on the circumstances and procedural requirements under which estates and testamentary trusts can qualify as S corporation shareholders so as to ensure the underlying corporation maintains its S status.

Estates 

The estate of a U.S. citizen or resident alien qualifies as an eligible S corporation shareholder for the duration of the administration of the estate. (Section 1361(b)(1)(B)). Under long-standing case law, an estate is considered “under administration” during the reasonable period necessary for the executor to perform all of the duties with respect to the distribution and administration of the estate. See, e.g., Old Virginia Brick Co., Inc. v. Comm’r., 66-USTC 9708.

Where the estate administration is unreasonably prolonged, the estate is deemed terminated and the S corporation stock deemed distributed to the beneficiaries. (Id.) Note, however, the IRS will not consider the administration of an estate unreasonably prolonged if the purpose is to pay estate tax on an installment basis under Code Section 6166. (Rev. Rul. 76-23, 1976-1 C.B. 264).

S corporation stock held in a minor’s or incompetent person’s estate is deemed owned by such person directly and is not considered to be held by an estate for purposes of Section 1361. (Rev. Rul. 66-266, 1966-2, C.B. 356). Additionally, with respect to the 100-shareholder limit and the applicable stock attribution rules, any estate’s S corporation stock is treated as owned directly by the decedent. (Code Section 1361(c)(1)(A).

Testamentary Trusts

A trust that receives stock of an S corporation pursuant to the terms of a will is automatically considered a qualified S corporation shareholder for a two-year period beginning on the date the stock is transferred to the trust. (Code Section 1362(c)(2)(A)(iii). The Code defines trusts in this category only by the nature of the transfer of S corporation stock. Therefore, it is not relevant whether the trust receiving S corporation stock is created by the same testamentary instrument or if it is a pre-existing trust. See Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(k)(1), Example 3(i). During the two-year period, the S corporation stock is deemed owned by the estate of the testator whose will transfers the relevant stock.

In the absence of another means of qualification, such as the trust being a grantor trust as to the owner (discussed below), a trustee of a testamentary trust may find itself with a two-year limit on retention of the S corporation stock. Importantly, however, a testamentary trust meeting certain requirements can be an eligible S corporation stock shareholder indefinitely if it elects to be treated as an Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT) or as a Qualified Subchapter S Trust (QSST). The rules for trusts to qualify as ESBTs or QSSTs are discussed in detail below. (Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(h)(3)(i)(B)).

A testamentary trust that intends to become a QSST or ESBT must file the applicable election within two months and 16 days after the end of the two-year automatic qualification period for testamentary trusts discussed above. 

From a planning standpoint, it is therefore important to draft the testamentary trust provisions to allow for ESBT or QSST qualification. During the administration of the estate, the executor should determine (a) which type of election is permitted by the terms of the will and is in the best interests of the beneficiaries, and (b) ensure that the requisite election is ultimately made, as failure to timely make the appropriate election can result in the loss of S status for the corporation.

In most cases and for administrative simplicity, it is best practice to retain the S corporation stock in the estate until the ultimate distribution of the estate assets and then make the appropriate election for the testamentary trust to be effective as of the date of the stock transfer from the estate.

Below is a discussion of the requirements for electing QSST and ESBT status for trusts, as well as the procedures and deadlines for making the elections.

Qualified Subchapter S Trusts (QSST)

Created by the Economic Recovery Act of 1981, the QSST is the first of two elective treatments that allow a trust to remain an eligible shareholder of an S corporation for an indefinite duration. Under Code Section 1361(d)(3), a trust must meet the following criteria to qualify as a QSST:
• All trust income must be distributed to a single income beneficiary who is a U.S. citizen or resident alien until the earlier of the death of the beneficiary or the termination of the trust;
• Any principal distributed during the current income beneficiary’s lifetime must be distributed only to that beneficiary; and
• The trust agreement must provide that if the trust is terminated during the beneficiary’s lifetime, all trust assets are to be distributed to the current income beneficiary.

The requirement for income to be distributed to a single income beneficiary is often cited as the largest disadvantage of a QSST. The income distribution requirement effectively causes the income to accumulate in the taxable estate of the current income beneficiary, deprives the trust income of protection from the income beneficiary’s creditors and former spouses, and allows other beneficiaries (e.g., minor children) to potentially share in the trust income via gifts from the income beneficiary, which the grantor may not have intended.

Another significant disadvantage of a QSST election is the limitation of only one income beneficiary for the trust. This prevents use of the QSST election in common bypass or family structures. Note however, QTIP trusts generally qualify for QSST treatment due to having the surviving spouse as the sole income beneficiary and restrictions on distributions to others during the surviving spouse’s life.

The QSST Election

Code Section 1361(d)(2)(A) requires the current income beneficiary of the trust to make the QSST election. The QSST election is due within two months and 16 days following the transfer of the S corporation stock to the trust and is revocable only with the consent of the Secretary. (Code Section 1361(d)(2)(C)–(D)). Additionally, a separate election must be made by the beneficiary with respect to each S corporation in which the trust owns stock. (Code Section 1361(d)(2)(B)(i)). 

Under Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(j)(6)(ii), the QSST election must be in a form or statement that:
• Contains the name, address and taxpayer identification number of the current income beneficiary, the trust and the S corporation;
• Identifies the election as an election made under Code Section 1361(d)(2);
• Specifies the date on which the election is to become effective (not earlier than 15 days and two months before the date on which the election is filed);
• Specifies the date (or dates) on which the stock of the S corporation was transferred to the trust; and
• Provides representations that the trust meets all of the requirements of a QSST under Code Section 1361(d)(3).

Part III of IRS Form 2553, Election by a Small Business Corporation, is used to make the QSST election only if stock of the corporation has been transferred to the trust on or before the date on which the corporation makes its election to be an S corporation. 

Electing Small Business Trust (ESBT)

ESBTs were created by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996 as a more flexible alternative to QSSTs. Unlike a QSST, an ESBT may have multiple beneficiaries and accumulate income.

Each “potential current beneficiary” of an ESBT must be an eligible S corporation shareholder and will count towards the 100-shareholder limit. (Code Section 1361(c)(2)(B)(v)). Note, however, an ESBT may have nonresident alien as a potential current beneficiary. (Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(m)(1)(ii)(D)).

A potential current beneficiary generally includes any person who during the relevant period is entitled to or may receive at the discretion of any person a distribution from the income or principal of the trust. (Code Section 1361(e)(2)). For example, with a bypass trust, the surviving spouse and each living descendant will count as a potential current beneficiary. 

The price for this flexibility is that, unlike a QSST, the ESBT is treated as a separate taxpaying entity with respect to the S corporation stock, which adds administrative complexity and a potentially higher tax liability on the S corporation income. Specifically, an ESBT is effectively split into two trusts for tax purposes with one “trust” holding only the stock in one or more S corporations and a separate “trust” holding the remaining assets. (Code Section 641(c)(1)).

The “trust” holding the S corporation stock pays tax on the S corporation income at the maximum marginal rate for individuals. (Code Section 641(c)(2)(A)). Importantly, this tax is paid at the trust level and at the highest rate even if the trust subsequently makes corresponding distributions to the beneficiaries. (Code Section 641(c)(2)(C)).

There is an additional restriction on qualification as an ESBT, which provides that no interest in the trust may have been acquired by a purchase. (Code Section 1361(e)(1)(A)(ii)). A purchase for this purpose is defined as any transaction in which the acquirer takes a cost basis under Section 1012. (Code Section 1361(e)(1)(C)). It is important to note that this restriction does not disallow the ESBT from acquiring stock in an S corporation by purchase.

The ESBT Election

The trustee of the trust, not the beneficiaries, makes ESBT election, which is only revocable with the consent of the Secretary. Unlike the QSST election, a single ESBT election covers all transfers of S corporation stock to the electing trust. (Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(m)(2)(i)). Under Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(m)(2)(ii), the ESBT election must be in a statement that includes:
• The name, address and taxpayer identification number of the trust, the potential current beneficiaries and the S corporation(s) in which the trust owns stock;
• An identification of the election as an ESBT election under Section 1361(e)(3);
• The first date on which the trust owned stock in each S corporation;
• The date on which the election is to become effective; and
• Representations signed by the trustee stating that the trust meets the requirements of Section 1361(e)(1) and that all potential current beneficiaries of the trust are eligible shareholders of an S corporation (except that a nonresident alien potential current beneficiary does not violate the requirement that all potential current beneficiaries be eligible shareholders).

The ESBT election has the same due date of two months and 16 days after the acquisition of S corporation stock as the QSST election. (Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(m)(2)(iii)). Please see Table 1 for a summary of the QSST and ESBT requirements.

 

Table 1. Summary of QSST and ESBT Requirements
 
   
 QSST ESBT
Beneficiary Single income beneficiary (must be U.S. citizen or resident).
 
Multiple beneficiaries.
Distributions of Income All income must be distributed to single income beneficiary.
 
May accumulate income.
Distributions of Principal Must only be made to single income beneficiary.
 
No restrictions.
Tax Liability Simple trust – single income beneficiary taxed on the distributed S corporation income.
 
Separate S corporation “trust” pays tax on S corporation income at highest marginal rate.
 
Election Income beneficiary makes the election; a separate QSST election must be made for each S corporation in which the trust owns stock.
 
Trustee makes the election; only one ESBT election needed for the trust.

 

Grantor Trusts and Qualified Revocable Trusts 

All grantor trusts qualify as S corporation shareholders during the life of the owner and for a two-year period beginning on the date of the owner’s death. (Code Section 1361(c)(2)(A)(ii)). 

Additionally, a revocable management trust holding S corporation stock at the owner’s death that makes an election under Code Section 645 to be taxed as part of the decedent’s estate will continue to qualify as an S corporation shareholder until the later of (i) two years or (ii) the entire Section 645 election period. (Treas. Reg. 1.1361-1(k)(1), Example 3(ii)). A typical management trust is a “qualified revocable trust” as defined in Code Section 645 and may make an election to be taxed as part of the decedent’s estate.

Further, because a revocable management trust with a Section 645 election in place is treated as part of the decedent’s estate, the two-year automatic eligibility rule for testamentary trusts discussed above will apply to any trust receiving S corporation stock upon the grantor’s death. (Id). 

When a revocable management trust for a married couple holds S corporation stock, assets are typically divided between the deceased grantor’s trust (for example, a bypass or family trust) and the surviving grantor’s trust (a management trust for the surviving grantor) at the death of the first grantor. If the S corporation stock passes to the surviving grantor’s trust, the trust will likely automatically qualify as an S corporation shareholder as a grantor trust to the surviving spouse.

If, alternatively, the S corporation stock passes to the deceased grantor’s trust or different trust created upon the deceased grantor’s death, additional steps will typically need to be taken to ensure that such trust can qualify as an S corporation shareholder. For example, QTIP marital deduction trusts created upon the deceased grantor’s death meet all the requirements to qualify as an S corporation shareholder, either as a QSST or an ESBT. Additionally, a bypass or family trust can typically only qualify to make an ESBT election.

However, the bypass/family trust provisions sometime provide a “carve out” where the S corporation stock can be held in a separate and parallel trust that qualifies as either an ESBT or a QSST. In this case, the trustee would sever the trust into two separate trusts, one trust qualifying as a QSST/ESBT to hold the S corporation stock and another trust to hold the other assets.

The trustee (or beneficiary, as the case may be) can then make the appropriate election for the trust holding the S corporation stock. With respect to timing/advisability of the ESBT/QSST election, recall that if the distributing revocable management trust previously made a Section 645 election, the recipient trust will have automatic S corporation shareholder eligibility for up to two years from receipt of the S corporation stock.

Accordingly, when handling an estate administration with a revocable management trust and S corporation stock, it is vital to determine early on whether the stock was owned by the decedent individually or by the revocable management trust at death, and it is particularly important to be aware of whether or not a Section 645 election was made for the revocable management trust. Please see Table 2.

 

Table 2. Summary of Time Period as Eligible Shareholder for Estates and Trusts  
Estates
 
Eligible shareholder for the natural duration of its administration (assuming decedent was an eligible shareholder).
 
Grantor Trusts
 
Eligible shareholder during owner’s lifetime (assuming owner is an eligible shareholder).
 
Remains an eligible shareholder for two years after the owner’s death.
 
If a qualified revocable trust (e.g., a typical management trust), a Section 645 election can extend eligibility past 2 years through the entire Section 645 election period.
 
Testamentary Trusts
 
Eligible shareholder for two years following transfer of S corporation stock from either an estate or an electing Section 645 revocable management trust.
 
Estate of the testator is deemed the eligible shareholder during the 2-year period.
 
At any point during this period and for the 2-month and sixteen day period following the two years, the trust may elect to become a QSST or ESBT to achieve permanent eligibility.
 
QSSTs/ESBTs A non-grantor, non-testamentary trust has two months and sixteen days from receipt of the S corporation stock to file a QSST or ESBT election; otherwise the trust is an ineligible shareholder.

 

Late Elections

If a trust fails to timely file the appropriate QSST or ESBT election, the trust will fail to qualify as a permissible shareholder, which can have significant tax consequences, including causing the company to lose its S corporation status. The regulations provide that a corporation may generally seek relief under Section 1362(f) for inadvertent termination of an S election by submitting a private letter ruling request. (Reg. § 1.1362-4(c)). However, there is also a simplified proceeding to obtain a late QSST or ESBT election. (Rev. Proc. 2013-30, 2013-36 I.R.B. 173). This also applies to a late election for S corporation status as well.

Rev. Proc. 2013-30 provides general requirements for late election relief. Relief must be filed for within three years and 75 days after the intended effective date of the election. Additional general requirements include that the entity intended to have the election in place as of the intended effective date and that failure to qualify for the intended status was solely due to the late filing of the election. Please see Table 3.

 

Table 3. Requirements for Filing a Late QSST Election
 
The filing for a late QSST election must be made by the trust’s beneficiary, and the filing for a late ESBT election must be made by the trustee. The filing must include the following elements.
 
A heading which states “FILED PURSUANT TO REV. PROC. 2013-30”
 
All information that would normally be required of a timely election
 
A statement that explains that the failure to timely file the election was inadvertent, and the diligent action taken to correct the mistake upon discovery;
If the late election is to be treated as a QSST, a statement that the trust satisfies the requirements of Section 1361(d)(3) and that the distribution requirements have been met and will continue to be met
 
If the late election is to be treated as an ESBT, a statement that the trust satisfies all requirements of Section 1361(e)(1) (other than the required election) and that all beneficiaries are eligible S corporation shareholders
 
A signed statement that states “Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this election, including accompanying documents, and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the election contains all the relevant facts relating to the election, and such facts are true, correct, and complete."
 

Addressing the Issues

Handling an estate administration with S corporation stock can be tricky. While it cannot be emphasized enough that a thorough review of Code Section 1361 is necessary when a decedent owns S corporation stock, hopefully this article provides a basic and practical starting point in addressing these issues as the practitioner works through the estate administration process.

About the Author: Jovana Popovich is a shareholder at Fizer Beck, specializing in estate planning and probate. She can be reached at JPopovich@fizerbeck.com.


  • Large Language Models

    AI in Accounting 2026: From Practical Automation to Strategic Advantage

    AI in 2026 is integrated into accounting workflows, moving from simple assistance to agentic systems that automate document intake, data extraction, exception management and review-ready outputs. CPAs spend less time on manual tasks and more on judgment, oversight and communication. Organizations that adopt AI deliberately gain efficiency and quality while those with weak processes see their gaps exposed.
    View Article
  • CPE: AI-Powered Tax Compliance, Part 2

    Machine learning is becoming central to sales and use tax operations, improving taxability classification, reducing manual review and strengthening auditability through NLP, dual‑threshold controls and human‑in‑the‑loop review. Case studies show ML reducing false negatives, cutting coding hours and accelerating reconciliation with anomaly detection. With strong governance and expert oversight, ML enhances accuracy, efficiency and compliance while allowing tax professionals to focus on higher‑value advisory work.
    View Article
    LLMs
  • LLMs

    Beyond Compliance – The Ways CPAs and CMAs Can Embrace the AI-Powered Future

    AI is shifting accounting from routine compliance work to higher-value analysis and advisory roles. CPAs and CMAs can use GenAI to automate repetitive tasks, improve risk analysis and forecasting, and streamline onboarding and documentation with custom GPTs and low-code tools. To adopt AI responsibly, professionals must understand its limits, verify outputs and start small - improving one workflow at a time while maintaining strong judgment and ethical oversight.
    View Article
  • Leading Together in an Evolving Profession

    Rapid technological change, especially AI, is reshaping how CPAs serve clients and employers, and this issue of Today’s CPA focuses on helping members lead through that evolution. It features articles on AI in accounting, corporate governance and AI-powered tax compliance, along with statewide chapter updates and a preview of Accounting Opportunities Month. The message emphasizes engagement, lifelong learning and the shared responsibility to strengthen the profession and inspire future CPAs.
    View Article
    TXCPA Accounting Opportunities Month
  • Universal Proxy Card Rules

    Activism Amplified: How Universal Proxy Rules Are Reshaping Corporate Governance

    Universal proxy rules have shifted power dynamics in contested board elections, lowering barriers for activists and increasing pressure on boards to perform, communicate clearly and govern transparently. Companies that fail to proactively engage shareholders, maintain strong internal controls and align strategy with investor expectations face greater risk of disruptive and costly proxy contests - even if activists do not ultimately win board seats.
    View Article
  • Bridging the Skills Gap in ESG - How CPAs Can Prepare for a Growing Service Area

    As ESG reporting becomes mainstream, CPAs are increasingly expected to measure, report and assure nonfinancial data. This article outlines the key competencies needed for ESG roles. By building these capabilities now, CPAs can prepare for one of the fastest-growing areas of the profession.
    View Article
    Sustainability reporting
  • Texas Legislature

    Advocacy Never Stops

    TXCPA is continuing its advocacy momentum after the successful passage of SB 262 and SB 522 in 2025, which created a new CPA licensure pathway and modernized mobility. As rules for the bachelor’s pathway are finalized, TXCPA is actively engaged with TSBPA. The 2026 election is expected to bring major turnover Texas Legislature. The Society is preparing to educate new lawmakers and defend against deregulatory efforts that could weaken licensing standards.
    View Article
  • Momentum and Vision: Key Takeaways from the 2026 Midyear Leadership Council and Members Meeting

    TXCPA’s 2026 Midyear Leadership Council and Members Meeting brought members together in College Station for financial and governance updates, a discussion of proposed Bylaws changes, news on AcctoFi’s launch, and more. The meeting also showcased major advocacy achievements, technology upgrades, continued progress in strengthening the talent pipeline, and long‑term trends shaping the profession. The event closed with a dynamic advocacy panel and an invitation for members to stay involved ahead of the June 2026 Annual Meeting.
    View Article
    TXCPA Bylaws
  • TXCPA Accounting Opportunities Month

    Inspiring the Next Generation - Accounting Opportunities Months

    TXCPA’s Accounting Opportunities Months connect CPA volunteers with Texas students through career talks, financial literacy presentations and community outreach. Volunteers showcase accounting as a dynamic, impactful profession while helping students build essential money management skills and explore diverse career paths. TXCPA is aiming to expand the impact to students statewide, strengthening the future of the CPA profession through education, mentorship and community connection.
    View Article
  • Understanding the Stakeholder Model of Corporate Social Responsibility

    Corporate Social Responsibility continues to evolve amid political, regulatory and resource pressures, yet most business leaders still view it as essential to long-term success. Although balancing diverse stakeholder needs can be challenging, opportunities exist to measure impact, improve engagement and integrate ethical practices into decision-making. Understanding and prioritizing stakeholder expectations remain critical drivers of sustainable organizational growth.
    View Article
    State of Corporate Purpose Report
  • What’s Happening Around Texas

    Chapters across Texas have been actively engaging their communities through service, celebration and connection. Highlights include Austin’s support at the TSBPA Swearing-In Ceremony, Corpus Christi’s successful toy drive, Dallas’ holiday gatherings and service projects, Fort Worth’s large Santaccountant toy collection and scholarship fundraiser, and Houston’s lively Mix and Mingle social. Together, these activities highlight the statewide spirit of service, networking and support within TXCPA.
    View Article
  • Take Note

    In this edition of Take Note: TXCPA’s All New Mentor Match Program; Unlock New Opportunities with the CGMA® Designation; ACAN Delivers Confidential Support When You Need It Most; 2025-2026 AcctoFi Scholarship Recipients
    View Article
    Peer Assisatance
  • Classifieds

    The Classifieds section provides a centralized place to find practices for sale, buyers seeking to acquire firms and specialized services, helping members efficiently connect with opportunities to expand, sell or pursue niche markets.
    View Article

CHAIR
Mohan Kuruvilla, Ph.D., CPA

PRESIDENT/CEO
Jodi Ann Ray, CAE, CCE, IOM

CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER
Melinda Bentley, CAE

EDITORIAL BOARD CHAIR
Jennifer Johnson, CPA

MANAGER, MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS
Peggy Foley
pfoley@tx.cpa

MANAGING EDITOR
DeLynn Deakins
ddeakins@tx.cpa

COLUMN EDITOR
Don Carpenter, MSAcc/CPA

DIGITAL MARKETING SPECIALIST
Wayne Hardin, CDMP, PCM®

CLASSIFIEDS
DeLynn Deakins

Texas Society of CPAs
14131 Midway Rd., Suite 850
Addison, TX 75001
972-687-8550
ddeakins@tx.cpa

 

Editorial Board
Derrick Bonyuet-Lee, CPA-Austin;
Aaron Borden, CPA-Dallas;
Don Carpenter, CPA-Central Texas;
Rhonda Fronk, CPA-Houston;
Aaron Harris, CPA-Dallas;
Baria Jaroudi, CPA-Houston;
Elle Kathryn Johnson, CPA-Houston;
Jennifer Johnson, CPA-Dallas;
Lucas LaChance, CPA-Dallas, CIA;
Nicholas Larson, CPA-Fort Worth;
Anne-Marie Lelkes, CPA-Corpus Christi;
Bryan Morgan, Jr, CPA-Austin;
Stephanie Morgan, CPA-East Texas;
Kamala Raghavan, CPA-Houston;
Amber Louise Rourke, CPA-Brazos Valley;
Shilpa Boggram Sathyamurthy, CPA-Houston, CA
Nikki Lee Shoemaker, CPA-East Texas, CGMA;
Natasha Winn, CPA-Houston.

CONTRIBUTORS
Melinda Bentley; Kenneth Besserman; Kristie Estrada; Holly McCauley; Craig Nauta; Kari Owen; John Ross; Lani Shepherd; April Twaddle; Patty Wyatt